GEA: A Complete, Modular System for Generating Evaluative Arguments
نویسنده
چکیده
This paper presents a system for generating user tailored evaluative arguments, known as the Generator of Evaluative Arguments (GEA). GEA design is based on a pipelined architecture commonly used in natural language generation. After an overview description of GEA main components, we focus on how GEA performs the microplanning tasks. Details are provided by examining the generation of a sample argument.
منابع مشابه
Generating and evaluating evaluative arguments
Evaluative arguments are pervasive in natural human communication. In countless situations people attempt to advise or persuade their interlocutors that something is desirable (vs. undesirable) or right (vs. wrong). With the proliferation of on-line systems serving as personal advisors and assistants, there is a pressing need to develop general and testable computational models for generating a...
متن کاملA strategy for generating evaluative arguments
We propose an argumentation strategy for generating evaluative arguments that can be applied in systems serving as personal assistants or advisors. By following guidelines from argumentation theory and by employing a quantitative model of the user's preferences, the strategy generates arguments that are tailored to the user, properly arranged and concise. Our proposal extends the scope of previ...
متن کاملGenerating Evaluative Arguments for Choosing a University
Generating recommendations is an important component of many computer-based information sources. Personal recommender systems are becoming very popular, as are other advising and assisting applications. For maximum effectiveness, these recommendations must be tailored to a user, both in the selection of the information contained in the recommendation and in the language used. Effective recommen...
متن کاملAn Empirical Study of the Influence of User Tailoring on Evaluative Argument Effectiveness
The ability to generate effective evaluative arguments is critical for systems intended to advise and persuade their users. We have developed a system that generates evaluative arguments that are tailored to the user, properly arranged and concise. We have also devised an evaluation framework in which the effectiveness of evaluative arguments can be measured with real users. This paper presents...
متن کاملTailoring Evaluative Arguments to User’s Preferences
Computer systems that serve as personal assistants, advisors, or sales assistants frequently need to argue evaluations of domain entities. Argumentation theory shows that to argue an evaluation convincingly requires to base the evaluation on the hearer’s values and preferences. In this paper we propose a framework for tailoring an evaluative argument about an entity when user’s preferences are ...
متن کامل